- April 28, 2014 at 6:25 pm #4670
Nice! Can’t wait to get this thing. :p
- April 30, 2014 at 2:11 am #4675
Hi David, I notice that the majority of the images you posted are from the zoom and only one from the 23mm. The zoom looks to be really good. So much so, the main reason for getting the 23mm would be for speed and smaller size. Of course, I bet the IQ of the 23mm is better than the zoom, but maybe not by a whole lot. What are your thoughts.
- April 30, 2014 at 6:15 pm #4679David FarkasNewbieHollywood, FLJoin Date: Aug 2014Posts: 414Currently using:
Leica M, Leica S, Leica SL, Leica CLOfflineMark Gowin;6340 wrote: Hi David, I notice that the majority of the images you posted are from the zoom and only one from the 23mm. The zoom looks to be really good. So much so, the main reason for getting the 23mm would be for speed and smaller size. Of course, I bet the IQ of the 23mm is better than the zoom, but maybe not by a whole lot. What are your thoughts.
Mark,
They were both great. You’ll see a higher percentage of shots from the 23mm in my review. These images were ones that just didn’t fit. At a certain point, I have to cap the amount of images in a review.
The 18-56mm is just very flexible and easy for almost every scenario, while the 23mm is more fun. It focuses faster, is smaller, lighter, and yes, a little better optically. I liked having them both.
David Farkas
Red Dot Forum
Leica Store Miami
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.