With the recently introduced Leica S3 now finding its way into the market, many photographers are taking a fresh look at the S-System. And while much of the attention is focused on the fourth-generation medium format DSLR and its brand-new 64-megapixel sensor with 15-stops of dynamic range, some may not be familiar with the range of lens options for the camera.
Given the maturity of the Leica S-System, the S3 has the advantage of launching with a full lens ecosystem. There are nine native autofocus lenses, broken down into eight primes and one zoom. Also in the range is a manual focus 120mm tilt-shift for tabletop photography, but I’ll be covering the more general use autofocus lenses in this article. When the first-generation S2 camera debuted in 2008, it did so alongside two initial lenses, the 70mm and 180mm. Shortly after, a 35mm and 120mm joined the ranks, forming the core optics of the system. Then, over the coming years, further designs filled in the gaps.
I’ve been shooting with the S-System since it launched and have had the pleasure of using the entire range of S glass extensively for my photography. Indeed, the S2, S (Typ 006) and S (Typ 007) became the workhorses for the majority of my landscape endeavours over the last decade. And no matter the conditions or how much abuse I’ve put them through, the cameras and lenses have always delivered.
Understanding the 0.8x crop factor and why it matters
Because the S Pro Format’s 30x45mm sensor size is roughly 60% larger than a full frame 24x36mm sensor, we must employ a crop factor when calculating equivalent focal lengths. But, unlike APS-C or Micro Four Thirds, the factor isn’t additive where equivalent focal length increases. Rather, the lens factor here is 0.8x, meaning we’ll end up with smaller numbers, or wider equivalent focal lengths, than what we start with. The math is simple. Just multiply the S focal length times the factor and you’ve got your FF equivalent. For example:
30mm X 0.8 = 24mm
But this is somewhat of an oversimplification, and glosses over one of the biggest advantages of larger format sensors. Essentially, we’re getting less distortion with a wider field of view. Let me explain.
Equivalent Focal Length
Focal length is focal length, regardless of crop factor. So, a 24mm is a 24mm, no matter what. Give that a second to sink in. Alright, but didn’t I just say that we had to use a crop factor? Yes, but that’s simply to arrive at equivalent focal length, which relates to field of view (FOV). The measured focal length never changes. Let's dive a little deeper with a couple examples.
On a Leica S, a 24mm has the equivalent field of view of a 19mm but retains the distortion and optical characteristics of a 24mm. Because it is a 24mm, not a 19mm. So, in the image below, I didn't have to worry as much about keystone distortion when tilting my lens up to compose the waterfall and double rainbow. The resulting image is expansive but not warped.
The same goes for longer lenses. The 45mm has a very natural look since it behaves like a standard 50mm while offering the more capacious view of a 35mm equivalent. Here's an environmental portrait I shot of an innkeeper in Iceland. Even though I'm physically close to the subject with a 35mm equivalent lens and positioning him away from the center of the frame, there is no distortion. And at the same time, I'm able to capture more of the surroundings to set the scene.
For even longer lenses like the 120mm, you get the pleasing compression of the 120mm but a more flexible working range of a 90mm due to a wider FOV. Hopefully this is making sense. But there's more than just equivalent Field of View.
Equivalent Aperture
Like focal length and field of view, aperture requires a bit of a conversion as well. Luckily, the math is equally straightforward. We can apply the same crop factor of 0.8x, but this time to the aperture value to get an idea of how an S lens will behave relative to a full frame optic.
f/2.8 x 0.8x = f/2.2
But, things are just a tad bit more complicated here. Given our equation, an f/2.8 lens on the larger sensor S camera behaves like a faster f/2.2 lens on full frame, right? Well, not really. See, the catch is that this only relates to depth of field (DOF), not to exposure.
Aperture impacts two important aspects of photography. The first, which coincides with our crop factor, is depth of field. A smaller number indicates a wider opening, which results in less DOF and smoother bokeh. Here's an extreme example. Both images were shot with the Summicron-S 100mm. The image on the left was taken stopped down at f/11, while the image on the right was wide-open at f//2.
The second impact of aperture is for determining exposure, and is one of the three pillars of exposure theory. The physical aperture in the lens, also known as the entrance pupil, allows varying amounts of light to pass through the lens to the sensor. Wider apertures mean more light, which in turn has a direct relationship to shutter speed and ISO sensitivity, the other two critical variables for exposure.
Now, in this case, just as focal length remains an unchanging measurement, an aperture of f/2.8 is an aperture of f/2.8 regardless of format, at least with regards to exposure. So, even though our f/2.8 lens might have the equivalent depth of field to an f/2.2, it is still an f/2.8 for light transmission and exposure purposes. Yes, the volume of total light passing through the lens is greater, but that is a different discussion.
Optical Excellence
S lenses don’t need software correction. In the EVF of a live view camera, lens corrections are performed in real time. But, when you gaze through the large, clear optical finder of the S3, what you see is what you get. That perfect, bright edge-to-edge view with no vignetting? That’s not software engineering, that’s simply outstanding optics.
All lenses are exceedingly sharp and offer outstanding color and contrast. Floating lens elements are utilized for optimizing performance across the entire focus range. Exotic glass types and aspheres are employed to provide corrections, minimizing or eliminating all aberrations, distortion and fall-off. And the resulting images are anything but clinical. Rather, they produce some of the most natural and realistic rendering of any Leica glass.
There are no weak performers in the range. Each lens shines in its own right and has its own characteristic feel. For instance, the 70mm is loosely based on the 50mm Summilux-M ASPH and shares many of its pleasing attributes, like forgiving skin tones and buttery smooth bokeh. The 100mm tends to remind me of a 75mm Noctilux-M with its ridiculously shallow plane of focus and lovely fall off. And the ultra-wide 24mm evokes the feel of the best M wides with tack-sharp precision, flat field reproduction and punchy color.
Weather Sealing
Being designed from the ground up, the S-System and all its native AF lenses are completely weather and dust sealed with numerous rubber gaskets inside and out. Front and rear elements are coated in Aqua Dura©, a hydrophobic treatment which repels water and promotes beading, making for easy cleaning. I’ve personally shot for hours in pouring rain, snow and hail, as well as standing under my fair share of waterfalls. Never has the S failed me. The system is rock solid and built for the great outdoors.
S-System Lens Options
Let’s take a look at the entire range one-by-one. I've thrown in a small selection of sample images for each lens. You might also notice that I managed to represent all four generations of Leica S cameras. And if you're looking for quick reference chart with equivalent focal lengths, apertures and filter sizes, I've got you covered with one at the end of the article.
Super-Elmar-S 24mm f/3.5 ASPH
Equivalent to a 19mm f/2.8 super wide
The 24mm Super-Elmar is an absolute champ for wide angle landscape photography. Paired with the live DOF readout on the top display of the S007 and S3, I can set my aperture to f/11 and dial in a perfect hyperfocal distance in seconds. Everything from 2.5m to infinity is tack sharp for every single shot, freeing me to concentrate on composition, framing and exposure. The 24mm is also my go-to for northern lights photography and architectural interiors.
Don’t let the maximum aperture of f/3.5 put you off. Given the massive 95mm filter size, imagine how much larger and heavier a faster lens with the same performance would have been. A mere half stop off f/2.8 is a small sacrifice for everything else the lens does well.
Elmarit-S 30mm f/2.8 ASPH
Equivalent to a 24mm f/2.2 wide angle
Sharing almost the same design as the slightly longer 35mm, the 24mm equivalent field of view makes the 30mm Elmarit a winner for landscape, reportage and travel shooting. A bit easier to manage for general photography than a true ultra-wide, 24mm is always a useful focal length that I also use frequently in both the M and SL. If the 19mm equivalent field of view of the 24mm Super-Elmar-S is too unwieldy for you, the 30mm Elmarit-S should be just right. This lens is sharp, distortion-free and offers wonderful color.
Summarit-S 35mm f/2.5 ASPH
Equivalent to a 28mm f/2 wide angle
One of the original four system lenses and the first wide angle to be offered for the S, the 35mm Summarit is also one of the fastest lenses in the system. With a maximum aperture of f/2.5 and a forgiving 28mm equivalent field of view, the 35mm Summarit-S is a great choice for low light and street photography. If you enjoy the 28mm lens on the Q or Q2, you’ll feel right at home with the 35mm Summarit. I also feel that while similar to the 30mm, the 35mm does have a bit more subtlety and nuance.
Elmarit-S 45mm f/2.8 ASPH
Equivalent to a 35mm f2.2 wide normal
The 45mm Elmarit is perhaps my favorite and most used lens in the S-System. The equivalent focal length of 35mm makes it an infinitely useful and flexible tool for walkaround photography and landscape alike. And while the maximum aperture of f/2.8 appears underwhelming, the resulting images shot wide open have incredible three dimensionality to them, perfect for environmental portraiture and general travel usage. And of course, the 45mm Elmarit-S is amazingly competent for landscape shooting as well, with edge-to-edge sharpness and decent depth of field when stopped down. Basically, the 45mm is a jack of all trades and master of all.
Summarit-S 70mm f/2.5 ASPH
Equivalent to a 50mm f/2 normal
The very first S lens, the 70mm Summarit plays the role of a fast normal lens well. Equivalent to just longer than 50mm with a maximum aperture of f/2.5, the 70mm is also the lightest and most compact of all the S lenses. Modeled after the famed 50mm Summilux-M ASPH, the 70mm offers a very similar rendering to its smaller M cousin. In-focus areas are crisp and detailed, with backgrounds fading into smooth bokeh goodness, especially at minimum focus distance. If you prefer a 50 to a 35 as your standard focal length, and appreciate the much smaller overall package, the 70mm Summarit makes for an unbeatable do-it-all walkaround lens.
Summicron-S 100mm f/2 ASPH
Equivalent to a 75/80mm f/1.6 short telephoto
A relative latecomer to the S lens party, the 100mm Summicron is often referred to as the Noctilux of S lenses. And for good reason. With an extraordinarily fast f/2 maximum aperture and longer 80mm equivalent focal length, the Summicron is a portrait master. The lens has all the dimensionality and bokeh you could ask for. But don’t feel limited to sticking to portrait sessions. The 100 Cron works equally well for detailed landscape and travel shooting, pairing well with a 35 or 45 for a two-lens kit.
APO-Macro-Summarit-S 120mm f/2.5 ASPH
Equivalent to a 100mm f/2 macro
My (other) favorite lens. Another of the first four main lenses created for the S System, the 120mm APO-Macro is simply stunning. Roughly equivalent to a 100mm, this one always finds its way into my camera bag. Astoundingly sharp, even wide open, this lens pulls triple duty for me. In addition to being an exceptional 1:2 macro lens for detail work, the floating lens element design affords the same resolving power at distance as it does in the close range. So, I can easily use the it as my telephoto on landscape adventures. And when I need it, the 120mm is also a gorgeous portrait lens, rivaling the results of the more purpose-built 100mm Summicon above. With a 20% longer focal length and closer minimum focus distance, the half stop slower f/2.5 maximum aperture still results in extremely shallow depth of field and luscious bokeh.
APO-Tele-Elmar-S 180mm f/3.5
Equivalent to a 150mm f/2.8 telephoto
From the first round of lenses, the 180mm APO-Tele-Elmar still remains one of the best telephotos to come out of Leica’s optical department. As sharp wide open as it is at f/8 and fully apochromatically corrected, the 180mm has no deficiencies. In order to keep the size and weight down, a maximum aperture of f/3.5 was chosen, which is still plenty fast for hand-held shooting. The 180mm APO-Tele-Elmar can work as a longer portrait lens, for product photography or landscape – basically anywhere you’re looking to maximize the compression of a telephoto.
To get some extra flexibility out of the 180mm, you can attach the screw-on ELPRO-S 180mm Close Focus Adapter, which shortens the working range to 1.1 – 2.7m. There’s no light loss like you’d have with an extension tube and optical quality isn’t sacrificed. And while it will physically fit on the same 72mm filter thread, the ELPRO-S is ineffective on the 120mm APO-Macro. We tried.
Vario-Elmar-S 30-90mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH
Equivalent to a 24-70mm f2.8-4.5 standard zoom
Corresponding to the most commonly used zoom range on full frame, the 30-90mm Vario-Elmar can indeed offer a one-camera-one-lens solution for the S photographer. It’s a big lens, with a 95mm front filter diameter, and definitely a solid piece of glass at 1.2 kg (2.8 lbs). But if that one zoom can replace two or three single prime lenses, there is an obvious net weight and space savings in your bag. While I personally prefer the faster prime lenses for my own shooting, I have used the 30-90mm on various outings and was very pleased with the results. Here, the choice between a zoom and a few primes is a personal one.
CS Versions
Leica engineered the S-System from the outset as a dual shutter camera. Especially for medium format, each kind of shutter mechanism has its mix of advantages and disadvantages. A focal plane shutter resides in the camera body and moves as a vertical curtain in front of the sensor. This kind of shutter can achieve faster shutter speeds but has a slow flash sync. On the Leica S, the maximum shutter speed is 1/4000th yet the flash sync is just 1/125th. This is due to the larger area of the sensor and the corresponding 25% greater linear distance to travel versus a full frame camera.
Here's a shot taken in daylight with strobe, but limited to 1/125th sync speed. Due to the relatively slow shutter speed, I had to stop down to f/8 at base ISO just to get a proper exposure. This resulted in more depth of field than I wanted, with a slightly busy background and a somewhat flat rendering of our subject, even using the awesome 120mm APO-Macro.
A central shutter, commonly referred to as a leaf shutter, operates in the lens, not the camera body. Instead of a curtain that moves vertically over the sensor, a central shutter is circular, like an aperture. It closes from the outside in. And while a central shutter can’t achieve the top speed of a focal plane shutter, it does offer flash sync at all speeds up to its maximum speed. On the Leica CS lenses, that’s 1/1000th of a second.
What’s great about the S is that with a CS lens mounted, the photographer can choose to use FPS for wide open available light shooting in daylight, or CS to sync with strobes. Competing systems usually offer just one shutter type.
Here's the same shot as the previous example, but this time shot wider-open due to the higher sync speed of the central shutter. We've now got a much more dynamic image, with a more pleasing rendering of the subject and a less distracting background. The 120mm APO-Macro just sings here.
Two important things to note. The first is that while a super fast sync speed sounds impressive, most photographers don’t really need this feature. Unless you are shooting in daylight and using battery-powered studio lighting to overpower the sun on location, you don’t need a 1/1000th of a second sync speed. Secondly, only CS lenses have this additional functionality, with six out of nine offering the option. Here’s a rundown of lenses with a CS version:
- 30mm Elmarit-S ASPH CS
- 35mm Summarit-S ASPH CS
- 45mm Elmarit-S ASPH CS
- 70mm Summarit-S ASPH CS
- 120mm APO-Macro-Summarit-S ASPH CS
- 180mm APO-Tele-Elmar-S CS
Notably, the 24mm, 100mm and 30-90mm zoom aren’t on the list, as the lens designs can't accommodate the CS mechanism.
A Word about Filter Sizes
Since Leica designed the S-System from the ground up, they had no pre-existing size constraints. And while the lenses are large, they're not unwieldy. The design team did an outstanding job balancing handling and haptics with optical and mechanical engineering requirements. And along those lines, they wanted to maintain some consistency with regards to filter sizes.
Most of the lenses in the S lineup feature 82mm front filter threads, which were then carried forward to the SL zooms. Just a tad larger than the common 77mm size, E82 still fits within the standard range of available off-the-shelf filters and allows for easy use with square filter holder systems as well. There are a few outliers though. The two longest tele lenses (120 and 180) have a smaller 72mm thread and the 24 and 30-90 max out at 95mm. Thankfully, 95mm is still a ‘normal' filter size, but it's at the upper end of the spectrum for sure.
Due to the much wider field of view, you need to exercise caution when mounting filters and filter holders on the 24mm Super-Elmar. Thicker filter rings can lead to noticeable vignetting, and you'll probably want to avoid circular polarizers as the results can be inconsistent, with some areas polarized and others not. This isn't a result of bad lens design, just a function of the physics behind polarization angles. At the widest setting, the 30-90mm Vario-Elmar can also pick up some vignetting from filter rings. My best advice in both these cases is to use the slim or wide-angle versions of filters, and you should be in good shape.
One final cautionary note is that the 120mm APO-Macro has a somewhat quirky filter design. First, in addition to the correct 72mm filter threading on the front of the lens, there is also an 82mm filter thread on the outer barrel. Because the lens is not internal focusing, the inner barrel moves inside the wider outer part at infinity and past it for closer focus. This causes two issues. If you want to use a 4″ filter holder, you will need to add a spacer ring in order to achieve infinity focus. I typically take a cheap no-name 72mm filter and knock out the glass. The other concern is that if you make the mistake of mounting an 82mm filter on the outer barrel and go to focus, you might end up with a bit a of mess, with the inner part smashing through the filter.
Adapters for non-Leica glass
I’d like to stick to native S lenses for this article but will mention that Leica does make some adapters if you want to fill in your kit with some non-Leica options. When evaluating choices here, the same math applies with regards to equivalent focal length and aperture. If you use a Pentax 6×7 105mm f/2.4 on the S, it remains a 105mm with an equivalent field of view of 80mm (remember our 0.8x lens factor). But, natively on 6×7, a 105mm would be roughly equivalent to a 50mm in full-frame terms. The focal length never changes, just the equivalence when used on different format sizes.
If you’re after autofocus and auto aperture capability, both the S-Adapter C for Contax 645 and S-Adapter H for Hasselblad HC and HCD lenses will work well. AF performance won’t be up to native standards when it comes to speed, but should be accurate, nonetheless. On the Hasselblad adapter, you’ll also gain central shutter functionality using the FPS/CS switch on the back of the S, up to the lens' maximum of 1/800th.
The S-Adapter V for Hasselblad CF and FE, the S-Adapter P67 for Pentax 6×7 and the S-Adapter M645 for Mamiya 645 are all purely manual affairs. They couple the lens and the camera together but focusing and aperture control are up to the user. If you’re planning on going the manual focus route, I’d highly recommend swapping out the standard center cross focusing screen with the microprism one as it will greatly improve your ability to accurately find focus.
No More Broken Focus Motors
Several years back, focus motors in S lenses started to fail. Over the ensuing months, more and more lenses exhibited the issue. Thankfully, Leica identified the problem and issued a recall for all S lenses once they were able to re-engineer a gearing mechanism that didn’t fatigue over time. And while most used lenses and all new lenses in circulation today have the new part, you need to be very careful when shopping for used S lenses. Always verify that the focus motor has been replaced with the updated version.
Final Thoughts
With the launch of the S3, Leica has breathed new life into the S-System. The new camera will find its way into photographers’ hands while used S006 and S007 bodies will start to surface at even more attractive pricing. And all those cameras will need lenses. Fortunately, the S lineup offers some truly stunning optics. Hopefully, this little guide will help you on your hunt for the right lens setup.
Quick Reference Chart
Lens | Equiv Focal Length | Equiv Aperture (DOF) | Filter Size |
Super-Elmar-S 24mm f/3.5 ASPH | 19mm | f/2.8 | 95mm |
Elmarit-S 30mm f/2.8 ASPH | 24mm | f/2.2 | 82mm |
Summarit-S 35mm f/2.5 ASPH | 28mm | f/2 | 82mm |
Elmarit-S 45mm f/2.8 ASPH | 35mm | f/2.2 | 82mm |
Summarit-S 70mm f/2.5 ASPH | 56mm | f/2 | 82mm |
Summicron-S 100mm f/2 ASPH | 80mm | f/1.6 | 82mm |
APO-Macro-Summarit-S 120mm f/2.5 ASPH | 96mm | f/2 | 72mm |
APO-Tele-Elmar-S 180mm f/3.5 | 144mm | f/2.8 | 72mm |
Vario-Elmar-S 30-90mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH | 24-70mm | f/2.8-4.5 | 95mm |
David,
Thank you. You wrote an extremely thoughtful and detailed explanation of the S lens system. You included some outstanding images too. It was fun to recognize the ones from the S2 autumn trip a few years ago. You brought back excellent memories.
David,
Great article about the whole s system. Waiting patiently to go outside and take photographs again.
Thank you,
Arif
Great article and lovely pictures. I am a semi-retired professional who was able to migrate over from a Contax 645 to a Leica S007, via the Contax adapter, thus “saving” my full inventory of Zeiss lenses. As you said, both autofocus and autoexposure work quite well so this “hybrid” solution has worked for me, and the S007 has been a joy to use.
Thank you for the excellent article! What especially interests me about the S system cameras is the 2:3 sensor size – I used to have the Fuji 50S and the Hasselblad X1D and I never liked the 3:4 sensors on those cameras (although I know many prefer the 3:4 ratio). I often found myself cropping my 50S and X1D to 2:3. I am shooting with the SL2 now, and was wondering what your thoughts are on the overall “look” you get from the S system vs the SL2, as well as high ISO performance, and if there is an appreciable difference. With the SL2 you get more megapixels than the S (007) but a smaller sensor, and the SL2’s resolution advantage will be even greater when Leica updates its firmware to allow for high-res multi shot modes.
Terrific primer on the S system lenses. Thanks for all this useful info.
Another great article and wonderful photographs David, thank you very much!
Thanks for the whistle stop tour of the S lens system. It has helped me understand better the advantages of my own GFX system. I run an SL 2 with SL lenses alongside it. I wonder whether SL lenses with the 82 mm thread can ever be mounted on an S 3 body ? I know that the reverse is true via the adapter. While I can see it is not commercially advantageous it would be a huge advantage to advocates of the faster-moving SL system to have the ability to switch between the two bodies with a mix of SL and S lenses. Much as I adore the output of the GFX 100 its ergonomics are, frankly, on the verge of being disastrous out in the landscape: key dials and buttons are just far too small and cheap. One longs for the ergonomics and UI of the SL/S both of which are a joy to use I the field.
David, great article. I have watched everyone of your and Josh’s live sessions during quarantine. I watched some of them more than once. They are a highlight of my quarantine. I have the SL2. Will the S3 have IBIS?
No. The Leica S3 will not have IBIS. Functionally, the S3 is near identical to the S007, but with a dramatically improved sensor, both in terms of resolution and ISO performance.
One more time, just to make sure I understand correctly… the S lenses labeled focal length (100mm, for example) is the equivalent to the 35mm field of view, correct? Meaning, if I were to mount the Summicron-S 100mm f/2 on an SL2 with the adapter, I’d expect to get a 100mm field of view. It is on the S system, with the larger sensor, where the .8x math comes into play, and that 100mm equates to a wider, 80mm field of view. Right?
I ask becuase I am an SL owner and am intrigued by the Summicron-S 100mm lens and want to understand whether I should expect a slightly *longer* or slightly *wider* field of view with that lens than with the Summicron-SL 90mm. (I totally understand there are a ton of other attributes to consider between these lenses, but I want to wrap my head around field of view first.)
You are correct. The marked focal length will behave as such on an SL. A 100mm S lens is a 100mm lens on your SL. On the S, it has the field of view of an 80mm, but the look of a 100mm. So, compared to the 90mm, you will be getting a slightly longer 100mm lens, with a bit more compression and a bit narrower field of view.
One more time for my sanity… I am asking this question as a SL2 owner, not an S owner: If I am interested in the Summicron-S 100mm f/2, should I expect a 100mm field of view on my SL2 (with the adapter, of course), or 80mm?
Based on your explanation, it is my understanding that the 100mm f/2 lens adapted to my SL2 will deliver a 100mm field of view and a maximum aperture (DOF) of f/1.5. (thus, the colloquial reference to that lens being the Noctilux of the S line, I take it?). Is this correct?
I am asking basically to gather whether to expect the Summicron-S 100mm to be a longer or shorter lens, in terms of field of view on the SL2, than the 90mm Summicron-SL.
Just to clarify further. When adapted to your SL2, the 100mm f/2 Summicron-S will behave exactly as a 100mm f/2. There would be no equivalent DOF conversion nor focal length conversion.
Great overview but you neglected to mention the Leica T-S Apo-Elmar-S. This is a great lens for product and landscape applications and gets very little press.
Hi David,
A great article that is an excellent reference source. In the table for the equivalent focal length and dof aperture you have listed the Summicron-S 100mm as f1.5 instead of f1.6 (f2.0 x 0.8 = 1.6) is there a reason for this difference?
Good catch. Article updated with correct value for the 100mm. Math is hard. 🙂