Activity

RVB;8489 wrote: Arif,If the M240 sensor is a reference for the new sensor then I think ISO is going to be pretty good,I don't own an M but of the files I have seen it has great Dynamic Range and a decent iso3200,

This is subscription only but great source of info and the ISO 3200 looks veery good,I expect the new S to be as good http://digll…

[Read more]

Doug,
I expect it will be a race to have someone show how they carved out a set of holes for the battery and the SD card to be accessed.
Surely a third party will offer such a service soon.

Interesting… I'm surprised at how thick the cover is. And wondering about doing some personalized cutting to allow access to the battery and card.

Doug

Pesto,
If you are driving up the coast, at the border of California and Oregon there is a spectacular grove of redwood trees (sequoias) at the Jeddidiah Smith Redwoods.

Safe driving!
Al

Did I mention that I got a T-snap?

Yeah, I got an Orange T-snap. I really didn't understand how this snap-on worked before. I mistakenly thought it was sort of thin rubber. It's not, it's hard but flexible plastic. I like it more than I expected.

No, I don't expect Leica will do this for the M or the S, but for a younger target, colors…[Read more]

Arif;8487 wrote: I agree, if it is significantly more expensive, then a no-go for me. Am very happy with the S2 and the 30-90 but was hoping for a clean 3200 ISO to make the move.

Arif,If the M240 sensor is a reference for the new sensor then I think ISO is going to be pretty good,I don't own an M but of the files I have seen it has…[Read more]

Leica should make repairing these faulty 120's and getting them back to their owners a priority. In other words…move these lenses to the top of the cue, fix them and ship them back promptly. I've had my fair share of Leica gear needing to be repaired. I'm happy to say that in every case the repair was handled satisfactorily, albeit not always…[Read more]

RVB;8486 wrote: I was also hoping the price would remain the same but I guess the new sensor and its R&D cost (which i'm guessing is stmicroelectronics) is pushing the price higher..

Its also supposed to have a new Auto focus system which sounds interesting…

Either way I'm happy enough with my S and have a 30-90 on order which is my…

[Read more]

PebblePlace;8485 wrote: Well, that stinks. With Ricoh putting the 645Z on the street for $8495, it's kind of difficult to believe that the new CMOS S is costing more to make than the Type 006. I realize that Leica may be opting for a CMOSIS sensor (or someone else's) instead of Sony. But geesh…

I was also hoping the price would remain…[Read more]

Well, that stinks. With Ricoh putting the 645Z on the street for $8495, it's kind of difficult to believe that the new CMOS S is costing more to make than the Type 006. I realize that Leica may be opting for a CMOSIS sensor (or someone else's) instead of Sony. But geesh…

Just had a chat with a Leica dealer in Germany.. they said that the current S will remain in the line up and that the CMOS will be significantly more expensive than the current camera.. Start Saving guys… 😉

Rob

noctilux and rudlinfineart, what can I say? When I started this thread I was hoping for maybe a tip from someone how to reset the lens or something. I certainly did not expect to hear from five different people who have encountered this same issue within just one week. Especially not on a forum like this, which is a nice place, but does not have…[Read more]

Add my name to the list. My 120 is in Solms as well. Was at a shoot and suddenly
it would not autofocus. Solms claims there was impact damage, but I do not recall
such an event. They are charging me a lot for the repair and state it will take 6 weeks.
It appears that there is an innate problem with the 120 that Leica needs to…[Read more]

rsmphoto;8447 wrote: Marc,
I'm very glad it worked out. I'm sure that was a huge sigh of relief. I haven't had that scenario with my S or previous S2 since I rarely shoot to cards – only tethered, but it's a good thing you found a solution. I've had that pit-in-the-stomach feeling once or twice and it's not been a pleasant thing. It's good to…

[Read more]

It happened to my 120mm non-CS lens as well!!
Sent it to Leica Solms for more than 2 months and I am still waiting 🙁

It seems like the failure rate of AF is rather high. Hope Leica will provide long term fix for this problem. Or else it is going to be very costly to service this problem after the warranty is over.

sorry, wrong mail
My mail is: [email]janudholm@gmail.com[/email]
Prive lovered to 12,500 Euro

OK David,
Your review convinced me to purchase a T.
And, instead of reading the manual, I reviewed your review.

The shutter is very quiet.
The handling is excellent.
The iPhone remote is magic. I set it up as a hot spot. It allowed me to do a quick test of
ISO performance, 100 vs 12,500 without a tripod, just using a table.…[Read more]

From this weekend: ISO1250 equivalent, using ISO160 and -3EV exposure compensation, “Auto-Levels” and some curve adjustment in Photoshop.

These are with a 1952 Minolta Chiyoko 5cm F2 lens, wide-open.

All hand-held,

Marine Corp Museum, M8 by fiftyonepointsix, on Flickr

Marine Corp Museum, M8 by fiftyonepointsix, on…[Read more]

Thanks Rudolf, I just hope it won't take too long the get the lens back. Six weeks sounds like a long repair time.

David, thanks for sharing. I hope you'll soon get your lens back.

The same happend to my 120 mm lens about three months ago. It had to go to Wetzlar and came back 6 weeks later, at no cost.

Rudolf